Tila Tequila avatar screenshot courtesy of Endemol
As you'll note by the ad banner intermittently flickering across the top of the page for the next ten days, Playboy is officially entering Second Life in June. And while their success would seem assured, that's far from certain. Just a couple months ago, MySpace superstar and former Playboy Cybergirl Tila Tequila opened a mansion hangout in Second Life. And though she counts over a million MySpace friends, attendance at her SL crib has been scant; it's consistently empty during peak periods, with Traffic registering in the low hundreds (i.e., a handful of daily visitors, at best.) Last year, the Suicide Girls launched an SL space of their own, and though the goth-punk babes are extraordinarily (and deservedly) popular on their own site (and again, were featured on Playboy's homepage in 2004), visitors to their Second Life locale quickly dwindled, and within weeks, most of the dozens of Girls who had created an avatar lost interest with being in-world.
All of which leads to the obvious question: in an online world already beset by sexy female avatars, is there a place for actual sexy women?
Tila Tequila avatar screenshot courtesy of Endemol
On one level, this is just another demonstration of SL's equalizing effect, which enables, say, amateur fashion designers to successfully compete with established corporate brands. In-world, sexiness is not a function of good genes and modeling classes, but Photoshop artistry and witty, text-based repartee. (Among other skillsets.) Real life age, physical appearance, or even gender are no barrier: with enough talent, anyone can simulate the beautiful and the sensual well enough that their avatar takes on life or something close enough to it-- and the dazzling effect on the opposite sex is the same. (And just as it's thrilling to note how a college kid can beat out Nissan in the SL car industry, there's something inspiring to the thought that some of the sexiest women in Second Life are actually grandmothers or burly dudes with good typing skills.)
Challenges exist even for genuinely attractive women with the prequisite aptitude. Most of the Suicide Girls are seasoned artists and geeks in their own right (which is part of their appeal), but even then, there are hurdles.
"I know a lot of girls probably spent hours on their avatars and shopping for the right outfits and piercings and whatever else," Lavonne Suicide told me last year. (Lavonne was one of the SGers to stick with SL longest.) "Some built houses, some got jobs. Perhaps they didn't spend enough time developing relationships with others on SL, or the world itself. You can only play Barbies for so long before you get bored. I think real human relationships would have kept more SGs going. If more people I knew from real life or SuicideGirls.com were online it would have been more fun for me."
Ironically, the commerce of sexuality in Second Life was also a barrier, according to Lavonne. "If SL jobs were better and paid more, I'm sure many would be thrilled to play. The sexual aspect was a problem. Some girls mentioned how working at clubs they were expected to pretty much have cyber sex with 'customers' for tips, and that it wasn't worth it." (Virtual tips are rarely competitive to what a performer makes offline.)
How all this relates to Playboy's project, if at all, is too early to say. For now at least, the paradox remains: somehow, this has been one aspect of reality that hasn't mixed well with the metaverse.
It depends on how Playboy's culture adapts to SL. If you don't understand SL, don't understand valuation, then SL players will eschew their land. Things have to be bigger and better, in ways that are meaningful to the populace. They should have the best looking girls, and those girls need to understand what's expected of them.
If you asked me, they would be better off hiring successful dancers plucked from the established clubs and clean them up some more (if necessary) to meet Playboy's standards of looks. These girls already know SL, understand SL valuation, and have no problem doing what it takes to be successful. Introducing new girls to SL who don't understand it and have no interest in it beyond the first couple of days or weeks isn't going to help them.
As for the cyberwhoring for tips aspect of it, well, that's why it's not in me to be a dancer. :)
Posted by: Cristalle Karami | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 08:37 AM
I don't think sexy in RL vs. sexy in SL is the issue here.
How famous/popular any company/person/group is in RL has nothing to do with how popular they will be in SL.
If you don't give people a reason to come to your SL location, beyond the conceited "I'm famous, so you should all want to be here" then you will be a failure in SL, even with your own fans.
The only truly successful RL/SL ventures have regular events and/or interesting interactivity. See Tateru's posts for the proof - http://nwn.blogs.com/nwn/2007/05/taterus_mixed_r_1.html
Posted by: Zorn | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 01:41 PM
As far as I'm concerned they are a waste of space. What can Playboy bring? Merchandise, which I'm sure will be popular as a lot of the illegal bunny stuff already is. 'Perfect' women we have enough - as you yourself reported you're hard pressed to find a more natural shaped girl in SL.
Maybe a good in-world recreation of the Mansion would be nice, just to have a look around without that grippy octogenarian in robes blocking the view ;)
Posted by: Laetizia Coronet | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 01:59 PM
The best part about every comment to every blog post out there about Playboy is it's all speculation. Heck, some have gone as far as just plain lying and stating what they are doing in their headlines. I love to see the conversation and debate prior to anybody knowing what is actually going to occur. Many comments are based on stereotypes related to Playboy so it's nice to see some folks change direction and come up with their own interesting guesses.
Marc
Posted by: MSGiro Grosso | Wednesday, May 16, 2007 at 08:05 AM
"actual sexy"
are the "regular" females playing SL not sexy because thye're not a playmate or suicide girl?
is that what "sexy" is these days?
Posted by: iconoclasm | Thursday, May 24, 2007 at 08:03 AM
i am a damn good looking dude,
and my avatar is damn good looking too.
Posted by: mrmr | Saturday, July 28, 2007 at 02:05 PM