« Value Subtracted: VAT to impact 70% of EU Residents | Main | Rise and fall and rise again: SL user growth staggers upward »

Wednesday, October 03, 2007


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Komuso Tokugawa

I think a better question is what is the benefit of a web browser thin client over ones like http://delta.slinked.net/ ?

There is definatly a use case for staying connected to sl via a thin client while working on other things in rl, but email is too slow and the 3d client too cpu hungry.

ATM I think http://delta.slinked.net/ is better than both the web solutions in this regard.

Opensource Obscure

@ Kamuso:
I'd say that for average user,
- Sleek installation is hard (also, Mac & Linux users can't apparently use it)
- official SL client installation is easy (but you have to download and install it)
- SL web-based clients do not need installation at all and they are ready for use

It depends on users' need and skills.

I feel that freedom of choice about clients may be going to improve Second Life adoption.

Peter Stindberg

SLeek installation is hard? Download, unzip, double-click the sleek.exe - done!


can anyone help I am looking for a link so I can use SL on my sons pc without a DL please?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Wagner James Au
Wagner James "Hamlet" Au
Dutchie Summer Special
Nylon Pinkney Outfitters in SL
my site ... ... ...