Nightflower Reports on the Reality of Virtual Love & Relationships for NWN
When I first embraced Second Life as my recreational escape, I jumped in with such reckless passion and abandon that it sent my whole world teetering out of control. Sadly, my experience was far from unique. The virtual world is rife with stories of the emotional wounds and relational carnage that result when the Second Life/Real Life balance gets out of whack. But having fought my way back from the brink, I see now that Second Life is not the problem. While the virtual world is an undeniably magnetic place, it’s ultimately the personal baggage, unmet needs, and coping skills we bring to it that determine whether we thrive, or...um, nosedive. So from the hard-won lessons learned by residents from all over the grid, here are five keys to living a balanced life for those with a foot in each world.
1. Don’t Romanticize Your Relationship with your Avatar
I love my avatar Night, and enjoy alternating between talking about her as if she were me, and referring to her as if she were a unique, sentient being. While there are some valuable kernels of truth in that viewpoint for a discussion on identity, that kind of talk is potentially destructive hogwash if we’re talking about balance. In a literal sense, Night and I are not two people with two lives. I am one woman, choosing to invest a portion of my finite resources of time, money, headspace, and emotional bandwidth by meeting with real people in a pretend world. As much as I love to passionately soliloquize about the transcendent, eternal qualities of our virtual selves, my emotional health also requires me to reject romanticization, and embrace the truth that my flesh-and-blood self is inherently more valuable than my digital projection.
2. Know What You Want From the Virtual World
I don’t think its possible to remain healthy using Second Life unless you can clearly articulate why you are there, and be genuinely at peace with the reason. Maybe you turn to the virtual world to overcome a physical limitation, explore a creative passion, or indulge in runway fashion on a Wal-Mart budget. If you know that and are comfortable embracing it, then you’re likely in the clear. But if you’re spending countless hours shopping, socializing and SLexing, and can’t cleanly put your finger on why, then chances are that you’re using your virtual life to meet needs that you aren’t willing to acknowledge in your real life. That means you’re being driven by internal forces you don’t understand, and it won’t be long before they drive you over a cliff.
3. Ground Yourself Daily in the Real World
The real challenge is not gaining perspective, but the daily task of keeping it. For many, committing to a specific real world activity works as an ongoing exercise in perspective. For instance, a friend of mine told me that he feels he was saved from obsessive SL use by committing to a daily walk in the hills behind his house. Energized by the real world, he would often feel uninterested in Second Life, and he saw his in-world hours plummet by half. For me, reading a story to my youngest every day serves as a moving, visceral reminder of what really matters, instantly putting SL in its proper place in my heart.
4. Set Practical, Non-Negotiable Limits
While I believe the battle for balance is fought and won by maintaining a proper perspective, it sure doesn’t hurt to put some purely practical measures in place to help you live by what you’ve learned. For me that means resolving to go to bed with my husband every night, rather than staying up late in SL after he’s gone to sleep. Many people shared with me that setting non-negotiable logout times, or establishing weekly non-SL days, or having to “earn” in-world time by engaging in RL activities were guardrails that kept them safely within healthy boundaries.
5. Don't Make Any Virtual World Investment That Would Crush You, If It Disappeared Tomorrow
As I recently stewed over how best to financially manage my Petable Turtle farm in SL, an experienced breeder told me, “Just don’t invest what you can’t afford to lose.” It took a while for the profundity of that statement to hit home. If Linden Lab went belly-up tomorrow, would you crash and burn? If your SL lover poofed forever without explanation, would you fall into depression? If your virtual world business were suddenly rendered obsolete, would you land in real-life bankruptcy? The metaverse and the relationships that tie it together are incredibly fragile and utterly out of our control. If you see that any aspect of your life hinges exclusively on this delicate web, that’s a huge neon sign shouting, "STEP BACK!"
Admittedly, this is but a small sample of the many lifesaving measures residents of the virtual world have pioneered to maintain their mental, emotional, and relational equilibrium. So I challenge you, dear reader, to keep the conversation going. Please, share your sweeet balancing skillz in the comments below!
Nightflower is currently dividing her time between writing, raising virtual reptiles, and enjoying the new expansion just released for Lord of the Rings Online. You can read more at her blog, NightLight. Contact her on Twitter @nightflowerSL, and via e-mail at [email protected].
A great article!
I think people who separate themselves from their avatars (my Second Life is separate) are the scariest deluded folks I have ever met.
Typically if they have to create that kind of cognitive separation it means that they are doing something morally objectionable in Second Life and they need to distance themselves from it ethically.
There are certain things that belong offline. Intimate things such as romance, sex, eating, drinking, sleeping. These things are owned in our offline time and belong there for a reason.
Socializing, creating, fostering friendships... that is the extent of my engagement in Second Life. The good schtuff.
Would I do the pixel-lust thing again? Never. It did such a good job fulfilling my cognitive need for romance and companionship that I stopped seeking it out offline.
And there is no pixel in the world that can replace a real bonafide relationship. RL kisses and all. So why would anyone compromise and settle for cartoon affections instead of getting out there and finding themselves a relationship?
Ah. Because 70% of SL (or more) are married people engaging in escapist infidelity. They aren't single.
That's really the element of our society that is the most embarrassing and the one that discredits us the most.
Skylar
Posted by: Skylar Smythe | Friday, September 24, 2010 at 01:28 AM
Hi Night...
I think you've done a great job on this post. Your advice is probably hard to understand if you've just discovered SL, but after 90 days of initial addiction I think most peeps start to wonder about these issues.
Your 2nd point is really something everyone should do. I mean, sit down and define what they want. I have a pretty good idea after over 3 years inworld and endless hours of mulling the issues in my blog, but even now I can see that I need to do this formally. For one thing, it would give you a sense of how things are changing in your SL. And I've found that my goals have changed over time.
Again, nice work... Yordie
Posted by: Yordie Sands | Friday, September 24, 2010 at 04:06 AM
Excellent work. I too worry that if Linden Lab folds, what might happen to those who "live" in SL. We all have a few on our friends list and, no matter when we log on, there they are.
I keep telling educators to have a Plan B, but it would be more serious still for social SLers with an addiction to the world. I hope those sorts of residents read your post and consider what they'd do if our virtual world of choice suddenly ended.
And let's not kid ouselves: it could. We're bigger than Metaplace or There or The Sims Online, but at one point each of those worlds had its regulars who build virtual lives. And then, it ended.
Posted by: Ignatius Onomatopoeia | Friday, September 24, 2010 at 04:31 AM
Why Skylar, that was the most vicious attack I've seen yet on immersionists, and it was even backed up by fake numbers that you pulled out of your butt! Are you running for office?
Posted by: Arcadia Codesmith | Friday, September 24, 2010 at 06:48 AM
I have my avatar all backed up in case anything ever happens to LL and SL vanishes. The avatar incorporates about ~15 different content creator's various clothing and accessories, yes, but, it's reserved for a much graver time, let's hope it never happens.
Posted by: Adeon Writer | Friday, September 24, 2010 at 06:50 AM
There is no effective way to relate to the value of your virtual presence by "practical" and "controlled" means. That is precisely why LL is failing.
Posted by: comoro Infinity | Friday, September 24, 2010 at 07:04 AM
i started writing a response here, but it got too long, so i made a blog post instead:
http://slifefantastic.blogspot.com/2010/09/balancing-act-its-not-acting-its-being.html
:)
Posted by: Carrie Lexington | Friday, September 24, 2010 at 09:48 AM
Go read Carrie's blog post -- critical point.
Posted by: Arcadia Codesmith | Friday, September 24, 2010 at 10:27 AM
A fine article.. except the part about not emotionally investing beyond what you can afford to lose. I'm sorry but thats not possible if you keep in mind that the people your talking to are 'real' as you yourself stated.
Emotional investments in your "SL" friends and, in some caes, partners, cannot be controlled to giving a certain amount. You love someone or you dont, no matter where you meet or how you communicate.
If my RL partner died tomorrow would I be depressed beyond belief? Yes. If my RL best friend got sick would I worry myself mad? Yes. If my SL best friend, who I talk to more than my RL best friend on a daily basis was distressed would I stay up all night talking to them to make sure theyre okay?
Of course I would, with no regrets.
I (if not the entire human species) cannot regulate my love for the people I care about, and I strongly object to that being a sign of being unbalanced. Loving the REAL people we meet through SL is not a sign of being unstable, its a sign that we have made a real emotional connection.
If you meet someone in a bar one night, and they say there names Fred and they make you laugh with dirty jokes, you know no more about them than if you met them in sl. Means of communication does NOT determine the depth of a relationship between two people.
Posted by: Keira seerose | Friday, September 24, 2010 at 11:25 AM
I've just returned from a long (8months) break from sl, and I think that was a good thing for me. I'm trying for better balance this time.
My number one rule is I am not allowed to deline or cancel any rl activities for sl time.
Number two, I have a fairly clear log off time.
Number three, one of the things I looked for coming back was another sl relationship. My rl broken heart and life are healing and I am not ready for a relationship in my rl but I could use some romance, fun, and sexual outlet, and I am more than happy to find that in sl. And I'm happy to say that is working really well. But as Night suggested, I had a clear sense of what I was looking for and my boundaries. I share rl information with my sl partner, we're FB friends, I have nothing to hide from anyone, but at the same time I have said clearly that I do not want it to cross to a rl romantic relationship.
As with anything you do for a serious amount of time in life the question is: is this adding to my life (the one life that I have)?
Posted by: Nova Dyszel | Friday, September 24, 2010 at 01:36 PM
Are you so invested in your virtual friendships that you would risk damaging your real-life relationships for them? There are a lot of people in that situation, and most of them are thinking, "oh, she'll never find out", "oh, he doesn't care what I do online", "oh, she's being selfish, I'm just having fun, what's the harm?" And too many of those people are hurt and broken when their real-life partner just doesn't come home one day.
Let me tell something I've learned. The real- life people you think could never leave you? They can. And if you're investing three times as much time online as you are tending to your real-life loves, you're making a very high-stakes, high-risk gamble.
Posted by: Arcadia Codesmith | Friday, September 24, 2010 at 01:43 PM
I have a busy schedule outside of SL. Of course, I'm a part of a generation where most of my friends and classmates probably spend time playing WoW or some other game. We talk about things casually and try to have fun in different ways.
If you're worried about getting too into SL, schedule things for yourself to do irl. Join a club, volunteer somewhere, etc. You'll be so busy, that you'll be HAPPY to have time in SL after all of that.
Posted by: Aemeth | Friday, September 24, 2010 at 04:43 PM
>I think people who separate themselves from their avatars (my Second Life is separate) are the scariest deluded folks I have ever met.<
This shows a lack of understanding regarding the various states of mind the brain can generate. It might seem like everyone has one self, because everyone has one brain. However, the brain has many different processes, not all of which are compatible. From birth, the brain connects some memories via webs of association, and weakens the association between other memories. So, depending on genetic leanings and the experiences you are exposed to, your mind can evolve different kinds of mental states, some of which can make you feel very much like you are a single self, while others can make you feel as though your mind is cohabited by more than one self.
Functional imaging strongly suggests that this is not just as an act. For example, when measuring activity in 'personality switchers', brainwave coherence (which is a measure of which neurons have synchronized their firing) is completely different for each personality, which strongly suggests these people really do think and feel differently in each state. Crucially, when actors are asked to mimic personality-switching (or when real personality-switchers are asked to act out the condition) no such change in brainwave coherence is apparent.
These people are no more deluded in having a subjective sense of many selves than are people who feel they are one self. Each is simply one among many states of mind the brain can generate. The good thing about SL is that it enables each person to develop an avatar (or several!) that best suits how they truly feel, something that is not always possible in RL, what with the prejudices and presumptions society indoctrinates us with.
Posted by: Extropia DaSilva | Sunday, September 26, 2010 at 03:46 AM
You might have heard of multiple personality disorder, or disociative identity disorder. MPD/DID is an extreme form of dissasociation in which personalities share no common memories and so are completey unaware of each other's presence. But some people have 'co-consciousness', which occurs when the mind develops many selves and also forges connections between them, such that the person is aware of the existence of others cohabiting in their head. The following is a transcript from one such person:
“First thing we have to do each week is check the stock lists on the computer, and that is really painstaking, detailed stuff. Personally, I would be hopeless at it, but Immy is great at it…People who know us well can always tell which of us has done a particular display…because we have very different styles…we can get locked into a tussle, with me arranging them one way, then P sneaking back and rearranging them…we came to this arrangement: I do it for a couple of weeks, then P does it”.
What if Immy and P were two avatars? Chances are, if you met them both in SL you would never know they share one mind. And, in some sense, they do not. Immy is one cluster of brain processes, P is another. There are weak ties between the clusters (if there were no ties, Immy think s/he alone existed in that mind, as would P) but the ties are not numerous and strong enough to make this person perceive a single self, or even a single self with different sides to its personality. S/he is many selves. Is this a delusion? Maybe, but only to the extent that any perception of self is a delusion.
Posted by: Extropia DaSilva | Sunday, September 26, 2010 at 04:03 AM
A very interesting post, and some equally interesting responses as well. I took a 3-month break from SL myself and found that to be very helpful. I'm back now with a different mindset, new rules, and a clearer sense of why I'm in SL at all. Where previously I was anesthetizing myself, now I'm very conscious of what I'm doing and why. That alone has created new insights about who I am, how I am, and where I'm headed.
Posted by: Zero Calael | Tuesday, September 28, 2010 at 12:58 PM