MMO and virtual world innovator Raph Koster recently made a very good point on his blog: A lot of the conversation around "avatar rights", a topic very much in vogue a few years ago when virtual worlds like Second Life were gaining serious attention from academia and deep thinking developers like Koster, is very much applicable to our new era of real world social networks like Facebook. In 2000, Raph wrote a landmark essay called "Declaring the Rights of Players". And now, as he writes:
Doing a search & replace on the original article with “social network” instead of “virtual world” is illuminating precisely because it doesn’t change very much... What was a hypothetical exercise is so no longer, and we should expect the same waves of questions that existed with avatar identities and virtual governance to return. If my daughter stays banned and Facebook continues to get woven into everything we do on the Internet, what impact could that potentially have? Does it mean that her real name and identity are simply not available to her?
Just as interesting to me, many of the leading figures who broke a lot of ground discussing rights for avatars are now deeply involved in Facebook: