« SL Developers: A Fundraiser to Benefit RL Cancer Research | Main | Let us Know: What's on the Top of Your Wishlist for the Steam Summer Sale? »

Friday, June 20, 2014


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Wow those links are long rambling ambiguous treatises on sexism, he doesn't give much in the way of specifics does he. I agree that sexism tends to be a sort of cultural habit that when brought into the light we see what a truly view of equality would be, but then again there is just as much insisting things are sexist when they may well not be, nor do they get at the real issues.

One example up for dispute (in reference to an objective in red dead redemption):

"Place a hogtied woman on the train tracks, and witness her death by train." So the objective is to locate a woman who cannot defend herself against you, tie her up and then kill her by placing her in the path of a train. You cannot gain the achievement by performing this act on a man."

And this differs to the innumerable amount of innocent men that get killed in red dead repemption? or just about any relatively violent video game? I suppose if it's a man he couldn't possibly be classed as innocent.

As for Assasin's Creed not creating female characters from the get go. There is some truth to this that women are not properly represented in the games industry, but then again historically it's men that have shouldered the brunt of most of histories warfare, so it is a bit artificial to add women in to that demographic given AC is partly historical, whether they should or not is a fair matter of discussion. Though really I think the games industry could do with being less violent anyway, and both men and women's role models should follow suit. Not having the women jump in the gutter with the men.



warfare changed to a mans game with the invention of the shield wall where physical strength is/was required to keep the shield wall intact to negate cavalry/chariot charges. Prior to the invention of the shield wall women were active participants in tribal war which were fought and contested at longer ranges. To overcome the shield wall required close combat with heavy armor and weapons. Physical strength again

war has since changed again. Attitudes toward women engaging in combat hasnt. Dont need physical strength to command a missle battery, deploy bombs or fly a drone skyfighter from a console

if war is in the gutter then is not and should not be/remain the sole domain of men just bc killing is nasty business


ps. am just putting a counter-argument. I think that war suxs. But while we have it then men need to accept that they not wielding a battle hammer/axe anymore


I would love that to be true irihapeti (I couldn't find much on a quick google search perhaps you could help me out?), for one it would address the cultural stereotype that men are more violent than women, but is also points to a truth that men and womens roles have evolved throughout history numerous times to meet the demands of the current economical and cultural climate.

That said by your logic women should have been involved in any war past medieval times, as soon as guns/muskets were invented muslces become less an issue. The two world wars of the twentieth century saw fit to send millions of men and only men to their deaths in actual horrific, dehumanising fighting, most of them without any choice on the matter. That silly argument that wars were chosen by a tiny fraction of rich and elite men in power falls flat on it's face when the whole culture supported the wars at the time, women included in that. The casualty count in wars over the whole of history is probably something like 99.9% men.

Arcadia Codesmith

In antiquity, the Scythians and Sarmatians both fielded female warriors. No Sarmatian woman was allowed to wed until she'd killed a man in battle. One explanation for the legend of the Amazons is Greek encounters with Scythian bands comprised primarily or exclusively of female warriors. It must have been a rude shock to ancient Greek soldiers, who regarded women as intellectually deficient chattel, to be slaughtered like fat swine by Scythian horsewomen.

Women have fought, died and killed in every major conflict in recorded history. War was never a gentlemanly tiff in a neatly-groomed field between two teams of smartly-dressed soldiers. War is the breakdown of civil order into anarchy. In the chaos, a woman can be a killer or a victim. Many choose not to be victims. Lacking a uniform and a rank does not make you a non-combatant. Lacking the will to fight back does.

Putting women on a pedestal to shield us from the bloody horrors of war (or the infinitely more sanitary horrors of wargaming) is just as absurd as insisting that we are inherently inferior at the business of slaughter... particularly the slaughter of pixels with mouse or gamepad.



if want ancient times examples of shield wall (close quarter warfare) then keyword: roman

if want recent time examples of range warfare then keywords: bosnia sniper

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Wagner James Au Discord Why the Metaverse Matters
Wagner James "Hamlet" Au
Dutchie Summer Special
Nylon Pinkney Outfitters in SL
SL Hair Fair Wigs for Kids benefit
my site ... ... ...