UPDATE, 7/25: Post bumped up for weekend reading/discussion!
On June 20, the day when news broke that Linden Lab is working on a successor to Second Life, a subtle but important shift of perspective started among the SL community, and it's crucial we recognize and amplify it. You could see it in social media and SL-based discussion boards, and in the comment threads of news coverage about the announcement, and very roughly summarized, the transition looked like this:
- Second Life Enthusiast, June 19: Yay, Second Life is the best virtual world ever, and no matter its shortcomings, there's nothing else like it!
- Second Life Enthusiast, June 20: Yay, Second Life has a successor, which is great, because Second Life is getting really old and it has a lot of shortcomings!
So in the space of 24 hours, many of Second Life’s most ardent advocates turned on a Linden dime to become SL2’s most avid supporters. (Which leads one to think they weren’t Second Life supporters fully by choice, but also felt there was nowhere else to go.) Now that development of SL2 is public knowledge, and an alternative exists, I also see less zealous defenses of SL from hardcore fans. (Used to be, you'd explain why Second Life’s user interface is horrible and a total barrier to user growth, and you’d be guaranteed die hard SLers appearing in comments to insist no, no, it’s not that bad, it’s the users who are the problem.)
Now, hopefully, we can more openly and honestly talk about all the ways Second Life as a virtual world and a platform has not lived up to its promise -- and point to ways SL2 can and must be better. (Which is why I encouraged Iris to write her great post yesterday, about SL’s failings on the avatar level.)
That means at least two more important things: